nancy c. modrcin, the excalibur, toronto
Try to imagine a child so completely immersed in a
television programme or video game that he or she falls to
the ground in convulsions.
Last December, a cartoon television series based on
Nintendo's Pocket Monsters video game caused a scare in
Tokyo. The culprit cartoon triggered epileptic seizures in
over six hundred children.
The Japanese cartoon Pokeman, which aired December 16, TV
Tokyo, one of Japan's major broadcaster's stations, featured
a scene with an exploding bomb immediately followed by five
seconds of flickering light. The result was disastrous, as
photosensitive epilepsy was triggered in hundreds of
Japanese children.
Although TV Tokyo announced future airings of Pokeman would
be canceled if the precise cause for the seizures was not
diagnosed, no health warning had been launched prior to the
episode's initial debut.
John Phair, provincial communications officer at the Ontario
branch of epilepsy Canada, says the principal problem is a
lack of research in and regulation for such phenomenon.
Currently, the United Kingdom is the only country in the
world regulating the frequency of strobe lights on
television.
Seizures commonly occur when these are between five and 30
second flashes of light per second. Photosensitive seizures
can be triggered by television screens, video games,
flickering sunlight shining through the leaves of trees, sun
rays reflected on water or stroboscopic light. Some people
are also affected by different geometric shapes and
patterns.
"Because Britain and Europe are on different electrical
systems than we are in North America, and in Japan for that
matter, there are some differences," says Phair.
While slower frequencies appear to be more problematic for
many, Phair believes the conditions vary. "Part of it deals
with the trigger frequency being different in each
individual person as well."
Still, the problem in Tokyo is not an isolated incident. The
Ontario branch of epilepsy Canada was contacted about
televised advertisements in Canada causing similar seizures.
"There have been complaints about or comments about some
things that have shown up on Canadian airwaves," says Phair.
"One was an ad for TD Bank and that's the one that comes to
mind most of all."
The commercial promoted Toronto Dominion Bank's electronic
banking system, airing in late summer and early fall of
1997. The camera pans over shiny glimmering coins, with a
strobe light affect in the foreground.
Cathy Bertini, assistant manager of media relations at TD
Bank, is unaware of the number of complaints. "We did
receive a number of complaints, but I'm not sure how many
exactly." To rectify the situation, Bertini said TD was made
aware and proceeded to remedy the problem.
As with the creators of Pokeman, TD did not issue a warning
prior to the airing of the commercial. However, when the
probelm was brought to their attention they quickly decided
on a course of action. "We provided a schedule of when they
would be airing so that people who had epilepsy or were
susceptible to these seizures knew the commercial would air
and would not watch it," Bertini says. "We haven't run any
new ads that are of similar content."
In Canada, there are no regulations concerning the frequency
of flashing lights on television. Laura Dellal, director of
standards and compliance at Advertising Standards Canada
(ASC), says consumer warnings should be conveyed by the
advertiser.
"Because we don't have any provision in our codes that
deals with frequency of light or the transmission," she
said. "Even if we did get a complaint on it, what we would
do is forward it to the advertiser.
"Because we don't have any provision in our codes that deals
with frequency of light or the transmission," she says.
"even if we did get a complaint on it, what we would do is
forward it to the advertiser, letting them know that people
are concerned."
Della also says there was nothing in ASC's codes adressing
concerns of that nature. "Our codes deal with the ethics of
advertising," she explains. "From what I understand this
[epileptic attack-inducing commercials] is a relatively new
issue."
Phair finds the lack of policy ensuring the regulation of
potentially dangerous frequencies, and the absence of
warnings prior to the airing of these advertisements and
programmes, disturbing. He feels a simple warning would help
increase awareness and decrease potential harm.
[back to the top]
[back to issue 6]
|